-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement the Observable spec #673
Conversation
PR Comments: - caolan#672 (comment)
Requested Changes: - caolan#672 (comment) - caolan#672 (review)
Requested Changes: - caolan#672 (comment) - caolan#672 (comment) - caolan#672 (comment)
…e logic to observableSubscription
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good. Thanks for doing this.
I just have some minor comments.
Requested Changes: - caolan#673 (comment) - caolan#673 (comment) - caolan#673 (comment)
Have you verified that this code makes Highland work with Gulp? |
Just did: Created gulpfile.js const gulp = require('gulp');
const _ = require('./lib');
gulp.task('list', () => {
return gulp.src('**/*.js')
.pipe(_())
.map(file => file.relative)
.filter(path => !path.includes('node_modules'))
.tap(console.log);
}); Executed: gulp list Results:
The fact that we see the output wrapped by gulp's timing logger proves that it subscribed to the observable, processed all the files in a stream, and waited for it to complete. We are good to go! 🚀 |
Excellent! Thanks for all the work you put in. |
Thank you for all the support and code reviews. I’ve got a few small projects lined up but after I would like to make some progress on v3. |
In reference to #672 this is the same solution with a couple of variations for experimentation and discussion:
What do you think @vqvu?