[Data Indexing] Known issue relating to indexing of internal transaction traces ("Awaiting internal transactions for status") #916
-
Update - This incident is resolved ✅TLDR
We apologise for the inconvenience and are working hard to bring the service back. Thank you for your patience! 🙏 More detailsOn Friday June 9th, the indexing engine that powers the Specifically, our indexing engine started falling behind on internal transaction traces, which are expensive to compute, but not ordinary transactions, which are cheaper to compute. This means that:
The symptoms of this issue manifest the following way:
You can follow the fix for this issue in this pull request: This issue is being tracked here: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Bug reports by the community (raw)Replicating a few bugs reported on Slack Contract Call (
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update - incident resolvedAs of today (Tuesday, July 12), indexing has caught up with internal transaction tracing and is once again operating normally. We consider this issue resolved, but will continue to monitor its performance. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Update - incident resolved
As of today (Tuesday, July 12), indexing has caught up with internal transaction tracing and is once again operating normally. We consider this issue resolved, but will continue to monitor its performance.