Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

above and below should be available on assert #305

Closed
timruffles opened this issue Nov 12, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #311
Closed

above and below should be available on assert #305

timruffles opened this issue Nov 12, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #311

Comments

@timruffles
Copy link
Member

Unsure why there are methods on expect syntax that aren't on the assert one. Seems to violate principle of least surprise: they should be alternative syntaxes, not slightly different libraries.

I'm happy to write the PR :)

@vesln
Copy link
Member

vesln commented Nov 12, 2014

Happy to merge it in!

@keithamus
Copy link
Member

@timruffles it'd be great to see a PR for this. Plus you'd get some great credits in our contributors graph for it 😄.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants