Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed problem creating Interval literals with full ranges #1275

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2020

Conversation

chick
Copy link
Contributor

@chick chick commented Dec 12, 2019

Type of change: bug fix

Impact: no functional change

Development Phase: implementation

  • boundary testing was not taking binary point into account correctly
  • add tests to show where things work and where they are supposed to fail

Release Notes
A bug that affected could cause exceptions when creating intervals with range specifiers was fixed, e.g. val iLit = 6.0.I(range"[0,6]") would fail even though 6 is legal in that range.

- boundary testing was not taking binary point into account correctly
- add tests to show where things work and where they are supposed to fail
@chick chick added the Bugfix Fixes a bug, will be included in release notes label Dec 12, 2019
@chick chick added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Dec 12, 2019
@chick chick requested a review from ucbjrl December 12, 2019 20:10
@chick chick requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2019 20:10
@chick chick self-assigned this Dec 12, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@ucbjrl ucbjrl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@chick chick merged commit 4ad6242 into master Jan 2, 2020
@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is a bugfix, should it be backported to 3.2.x?

@ucbjrl
Copy link
Contributor

ucbjrl commented Jan 3, 2020

If it needs (or is based on) intervals, it shouldn't be backported. Otherwise, I'd say yes, but let's get @chick's input.

@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Oh right, intervals are not in 3.2, nevermind!

@jackkoenig jackkoenig deleted the interval-fix-2 branch July 7, 2021 03:44
jackkoenig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
This makes a change to the Dependency API that breaks chisel3. This
needs to [skip chisel tests], but is fixed with
#1270.

Signed-off-by: Schuyler Eldridge <schuyler.eldridge@ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bugfix Fixes a bug, will be included in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants