Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make StoreGen support narrow typ field #3479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

Make StoreGen support narrow typ field #3479

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

jerryz123
Copy link
Contributor

This makes it a bit easier to use the StoreGen circuit. StoreGen shouldn't error if the typ argument is narrower than maxSize would normally permit.

Related issue:

Type of change: bug report | feature request | other enhancement

Impact: no functional change | API addition (no impact on existing code) | API modification

Development Phase: proposal | implementation

Release Notes

@jerryz123 jerryz123 changed the base branch from master to dev August 22, 2023 08:23
@sequencer
Copy link
Member

Oh, the git commit is a little dirty, can you rebase?

@jerryz123
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should wait until after #3478 . After that, this should have clean diff

This makes it a bit easier to use the StoreGen circuit. StoreGen shouldn't error if the `typ` argument is narrower than `maxSize` would normally permit.
@jerryz123
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio copy master

@jerryz123 jerryz123 merged commit af8820d into dev Sep 19, 2023
25 checks passed
@jerryz123 jerryz123 deleted the jerryz123-patch-1 branch September 19, 2023 03:48
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 19, 2023

copy master

✅ Pull request copies have been created

jerryz123 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
Make StoreGen support narrow typ field (copy #3479)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants