Update the examples based on changes of spec.md

[fabiojose]

Signed-off-by: Fabio José fabiojose@gmail.com

Based on changes made in spec.md, in source elements.

[duglin]

While it does no harm to make these changes, I will point out that it is not necessary since 'source' is a URI-reference which allows for /path type of values.

[fabiojose]

@duglin I agree with you, but what do you think if the audience of this spec will get a little bit confusing? They get examples of source in spec.md and different ones in json-format.md. If they try to run the JSON files against the JSON Schema, these files will be invalid.

What do you think if we add additional examples here too?

[duglin]

I believe that #338 should fix the schema to support uri-reference and help with the confusion because we'll be using URI-Reference throughout the specs.

I actually wouldn't mind if we had a combination of samples that used a urn:... form and a /... form just to reinforce that both are valid. A lot of times people don't read the specs very closely (shocking, I know!) and they look at examples for guidance - so if all they see are urn:... they may jump to the wrong conclusion.

[duglin]

But to be clear, I don't think its a major issue either way.

[fabiojose]

@duglin Good points!

Closed!