Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync lto changes and enable lto for lto branch #8244

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_13_0_X/lto.

@smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X/el8_amd64_gcc11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29908/summary.html
COMMIT: a21be96
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X_2023-01-10-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/8244/29908/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29908/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29908/git-merge-result

Build

I found compilation error when building:

@@@@ ----> OK  EDM Class Version 
>> Checking EDM Class Transients in libAlignmentOfflineValidation.so
@@@@ ----> OK  EDM Class Version 
>> Checking EDM Class Transients in libPhysicsToolsTagAndProbe.so
Suggestion: You can run 'scram build updateclassversion' to generate src/PhysicsTools/PatUtils/src/classes_def.xml.generated with updated ClassVersion
gmake: *** [tmp/el8_amd64_gcc11/edm_checks/libPhysicsToolsPatUtils.so] Error 1
>> Checking EDM Class Version for src/Alignment/CocoaDaq/src/classes_def.xml in libAlignmentCocoaDaq.so
TFile::Init:0: RuntimeWarning: no StreamerInfo found in /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/sw/x86_64/nweek-02767/el8_amd64_gcc11/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X_2023-01-08-0000/lib/el8_amd64_gcc11/SimDataFormatsEncodedEventId_xr_rdict.pcm therefore preventing schema evolution when reading this file. The file was produced with version 6.24/07 of ROOT.
Error in : version mismatch, /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X_2023-01-10-2300/lib/el8_amd64_gcc11/libPhysicsToolsHeppy.so = 62407, ROOT = 62607
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X_2023-01-10-2300/src/FWCore/Utilities/scripts/edmCheckClassVersion", line 181, in 


@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • full_cmssw = true

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X/el8_amd64_gcc11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #8244 was updated.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X/el8_amd64_gcc11

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit e3941d4 into IB/CMSSW_13_0_X/lto Jan 11, 2023
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29926/summary.html
COMMIT: 07972c4
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X_2023-01-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/8244/29926/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29926/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f38a/29926/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.01 step 3
140.03 step 3
140.104 step 3
140.105 step 3
140.106 step 3
140.107 step 3
140.109 step 3
140.111 step 3
140.112 step 3
140.113 step 3
140.114 step 3
140.115 step 3
140.116 step 3
140.11 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 65451 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 117048
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 248
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3438220
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.4149999999999999 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.715 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11834.0 ): -1.439 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): 0.885 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): 0.254 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 16 / 47 workflows

@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the lto-branch-chg branch January 13, 2023 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants