Set tight mva value of HI initial step to be equal to highPurity mva value

[istaslis]

This PR changes mva value of 'tight' selection of HI initial step reconstruction. This is a minor fix to prevent confusion and it does not change the event content (because subsequent steps are dependent on 'highPurity', not 'tight' selection)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @istaslis (Stas Lisniak) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Set tight mva value of HI initial step to be equal to highPurity mva value

It involves the following packages:

RecoHI/HiTracking

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jazzitup, @dgulhan, @echapon, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @mandrenguyen, @richard-cms, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9410/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: bd73a73
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12223/9410/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12223/9410/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #12223 bd73a73

Adjusting the tight MVA value of the Heavy Ions initial step. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #12230 and #12231 are the 76X and 80X versions of this PR.

Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-11-01-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1