Set tight mva value of HI initial step to be equal to highPurity mva value (80X version of #12223)

[istaslis]

80X version of PR #12223.
This PR changes mva value of 'tight' selection of HI initial step reconstruction. This is a minor fix to prevent confusion and it does not change the event content (because subsequent steps are dependent on 'highPurity', not 'tight' selection)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @istaslis (Stas Lisniak) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

Set tight mva value of HI initial step to be equal to highPurity mva value (80X version of #12223)

It involves the following packages:

RecoHI/HiTracking

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jazzitup, @dgulhan, @echapon, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @mandrenguyen, @richard-cms, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9418/console

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: 67e1b54
I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsRun /afs/cern.ch/cms/sw/ReleaseCandidates/vol1/slc6_amd64_gcc493/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_8_0_X_2015-11-01-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_GRun.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Mon Nov 2 20:49:54 2015-date Mon Nov 2 20:32:29 2015 s - exit: 35072
cmsDriver.py TTbar_8TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run1_mc --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,L1Reco,RECO,EI,HLT:@Fake,VALIDATION --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot Realistic8TeVCollision : FAILED - time: date Mon Nov 2 20:45:31 2015-date Mon Nov 2 20:36:20 2015 s - exit: 35072

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9418/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
96658e0
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9418/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9418/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9418/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9446/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 67e1b54
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9446/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12231/9446/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #12231 67e1b54

Adjusting the tight MVA value of the Heavy Ions initial step. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #12223 and #12230 are the 75X and 76X versions of this PR, and they have already been approved by Reco.

Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_0_X_2015-11-02-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1