Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link board upgrade #18488

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 5, 2017
Merged

Link board upgrade #18488

merged 9 commits into from
May 5, 2017

Conversation

bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor

In the present system the Link Boards readout the RPCs every 25 ns, so although the RPCs has an excellent timing on the end the time is measured in BX (bunch crossings), where 1 BX =25 ns.
For PhaseII the RPC Link Boards are planed to be upgraded. The upgraded PhaseII Link Boards would be able to measure more precisely the RPC time, thus enabling precise time for the whole RPC system. The PR enables upgraded PhaseII Link Board readout to be simulated.

We have added also an option to turn on/off electron digitization in the same way as it's done in the following PR:
##17898

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 26, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @bapavlov for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimMuon/RPCDigitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jhgoh this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 27, 2017

@bapavlov , in the digi class you substitute cout by emd::LogInfo. It is enough to have one LogInfo statement and than use "\n" as cartrige return, the printout will be more readable.

There is special treatment of e-, why not also e+? there is some fraction inside RPC.

@bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@civanch OK. I'll fix an issue with emd::LogInfo.
About e-/e+ :
Some time ago both e-/e+ were excluded on the digi step. Then it has been decided to exclude only e-,
because of their huge abundance in the SimHits. Anyway now it's a good occasion to add one more flag to deal with e+. So, I'll add such a flag.

@bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

bapavlov commented Apr 27, 2017

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bapavlov are these changes important/necessary for the muon TDR central production?

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 27, 2017

@bapavlov , so, you do not apply a special treatment on low-energy e- but exclude it from new SimHits only. Likely majority of e+ will come from e+e- pair creation with not so low energy. Would number of SimHits be reasonable if a threshold (~1 MeV) for e- energy is applied? In that case, extra limit on e+ is not needed.

@bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpedro88 yes, the changes are important for the production

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bapavlov needs rebase
@davidlange6 apparently this one is needed too...

@bapavlov bapavlov force-pushed the LinkBoard_upgrade branch from 01cc0ed to e728bca Compare April 28, 2017 15:32
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18488 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18488 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 28, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 28, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19469/console Started: 2017/04/28 18:02

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18488 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18488 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

Pull request #18488 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 4, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

-1
Tested at: UNKNOWN
I was not able to find a release to test this PR. See the Jenkins logs for more details.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 4, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19578/console Started: 2017/05/04 19:38

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18488/19578/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1926 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1831050
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 10321
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1820548
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@jhgoh
Copy link
Contributor

jhgoh commented May 4, 2017

This PR is to be used in the TDR production, so this one have to be back ported to 91X.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 5, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 4c8ecd1 into cms-sw:master May 5, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants