Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gem rpc phase ii geometry integration #2276

Conversation

pietverwilligen
Copy link
Contributor

Inclusion of RPC RE3/1 and RE4/1 chambers up to eta < 2.4 with 192 strips.
Integration of GEM and RPC geometries in Extended2023 geometry scenario.
Build on top of latest ib: CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC_2014-02-03-0200

ianna and others added 30 commits December 20, 2013 16:29
…2X_SLHC

add originalXWGTUP() to LHEEvent and LHEEventProduct 62X_SLHC edition
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 3, 2014

A new Pull Request was created by @pietverwilligen for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Gem rpc phase ii geometry integration

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
DQM/RPCMonitorDigi
DataFormats/MuonDetId
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/GEMGeometry
Geometry/MuonCommonData
Geometry/MuonSimData
Geometry/RPCGeometry
Geometry/RPCGeometryBuilder
SimMuon/RPCDigitizer

@civanch, @ojeda, @danduggan, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @rovere, @deguio, @Degano, @ktf, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@andersonjacob, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@pietverwilligen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi All

This Pull request comprises quite a bit of work on the RE3/1 and RE4/1
simulation and digitization. Reco will come soon (probably ready for
SLHC8). Is it possible to include it in SLHC7. I understood the release has
been postponed a bit for HCAL. Is it possible to get this change in for
Muon? We would be greatful.
Thanks a lot
Kind regards
Piet Verwilligen

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:12 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

A new Pull Request was created by @pietverwilligenhttps://github.com/pietverwilligenfor CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Gem rpc phase ii geometry integration

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
DQM/RPCMonitorDigi
DataFormats/MuonDetId
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/GEMGeometry
Geometry/MuonCommonData
Geometry/MuonSimData
Geometry/RPCGeometry
Geometry/RPCGeometryBuilder
SimMuon/RPCDigitizer

@civanch https://github.com/civanch, @ojeda https://github.com/ojeda,
@danduggan https://github.com/danduggan, @iannahttps://github.com/ianna,
@mdhildreth https://github.com/mdhildreth, @cmsbuildhttps://github.com/cmsbuild,
@Dr15Jones https://github.com/Dr15Jones, @roverehttps://github.com/rovere,
@deguio https://github.com/deguio, @Degano https://github.com/degano,
@ktf https://github.com/ktf, @nclopezo https://github.com/nclopezocan you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig https://github.com/ghellwig this is something you requested
to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line
of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line
of your reply.
@andersonjacob https://github.com/andersonjacob, @mark-grimeshttps://github.com/mark-grimesyou are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of
your comment.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/2276#issuecomment-33976540
.

Piet Verwilligen

INFN -- Sezione di Bari
Via E. Orabona 4
I-70125 Bari, Italy
Phone: +39 377 67 03 132

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor

dildick commented Feb 3, 2014

@pietverwilligen, can you remove the 3 ".xml~" files?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 4, 2014

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 4, 2014

+1

@mark-grimes
Copy link

merge

3300, 4100, 4400, 40001, 50002, 60002, 4502, 4500 and 5001 pass

3400 and 15001 fail in harvesting - known error introduced by #2265 (test uses incorrect customisation for step 4).
50001 and 60001 fail in step1 - known error introduced by #2236 (FastSim only).

3400 with combinedCustoms.cust_2019WithGem seg faults in harvesting with the same stack trace as for #2250. Known issue (test uses incorrect customisation for step 4).

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2014
…y-integration

Gem rpc phase ii geometry integration
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 085a91d into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Feb 5, 2014
@pietverwilligen pietverwilligen deleted the GEM-RPC-PhaseII-geometry-integration branch October 21, 2014 10:40
ggovi pushed a commit to ggovi/cmssw that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2017
Upgrade frontier client to v 2.8.19.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants