-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-gex14 Remove some overlap in Run3 geometry #31574
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31574/18607
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
Configuration/Geometry/g4n.log
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
----- Begin Fatal Exception 24-Sep-2020 19:32:24 CEST----------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this file be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry - I missed it. I did a "git add ." without realizing the consequence
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the two commits be squashed together to avoid the file appearing in the git history (even if it is small)?
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31574/18611 |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+upgrade |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Apparently this PR caused two unit tests in DetectorDescription/DDCMS to fail
and
For more information see http://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/slc7_amd64_gcc820/CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-27-0000/unitTestLogs/DetectorDescription/DDCMS |
@markotel This PR has nothing to do with that failure. PixelBarrelSuppBox belongs to Tracker and this PR deals with PPS related xml's> One needs to investigate the failures independently |
@bsunanda these errors appeared since |
@bsunanda
|
@bsunanda I investigated a bit the issue.
to (
If we remove two out of |
This is surely error in the unit test. It cannot test on number of children in CMSE or on absolute position of a given child in the mother. It is better to inhibit the unit test for the time being till a concrete test is found.
…________________________________
From: Silvio Donato [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 28 September 2020 11:56
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee; Mention
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] Run3-gex14 Remove some overlap in Run3 geometry (#31574)
@bsunanda<https://github.com/bsunanda> I investigated a bit the issue.
You can compare the log from CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-26-1100<https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/buildlogs/raw/slc7_amd64_gcc820/CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-26-1100/unitTestLogs/DetectorDescription/DDCMS> and from CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-27-0000<https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/buildlogs/raw/slc7_amd64_gcc820/CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-27-0000/unitTestLogs/DetectorDescription/DDCMS>.
In particular there is a change in the level numbers
from (CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-26-1100)
#1: >>> 1 level: OCMS is a Box
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1
copy Nos: 1,
levels : 0,
#2: >>> 2 level: CMSE is a Box
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1
copy Nos: 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0,
#3: >>> 3 level: CMStoZDC is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/CMStoZDC_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 0,
#4: >>> 3 level: CMStoZDC is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/CMStoZDC_2
copy Nos: 1, 1, 2,
levels : 0, 0, 1,
#5: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP420 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP420_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 2,
#6: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP420 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP420_2
copy Nos: 1, 1, 2,
levels : 0, 0, 3,
#7: >>> 3 level: Tracker is a Polycone
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/Tracker_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 4,
to (CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-27-0000)
#1: >>> 1 level: OCMS is a Box
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1
copy Nos: 1,
levels : 0,
#2: >>> 2 level: CMSE is a Box
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1
copy Nos: 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0,
#3: >>> 3 level: CMStoZDC is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/CMStoZDC_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 0,
#4: >>> 3 level: CMStoZDC is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/CMStoZDC_2
copy Nos: 1, 1, 2,
levels : 0, 0, 1,
#5: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP4201 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP4201_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 2,
#6: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP4201 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP4201_2
copy Nos: 1, 1, 2,
levels : 0, 0, 3,
#7: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP4202 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP4202_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 4,
#8: >>> 3 level: ZDCtoFP4202 is a Tube
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/ZDCtoFP4202_2
copy Nos: 1, 1, 2,
levels : 0, 0, 5,
#9: >>> 3 level: Tracker is a Polycone
Full path to it is world_volume/OCMS_1/CMSE_1/Tracker_1
copy Nos: 1, 1, 1,
levels : 0, 0, 6,
If we remove two out of ZDCtoFP4201_1, ZDCtoFP4201_2, ZDCtoFP4202_1, ZDCtoFP4202_2, the level numbers do not change (eg. levels : 0, 0, 4, for Tracker) and then the tests pass.
I'm not sure if this means there is an error in the geometry or in the unit test.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31574 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGMZOTO46BSDUUUHKG25DLSIBMVXANCNFSM4RYY4UWQ>.
|
It is better to remove levels from the unit test - can you let me know the name of the unit test? |
PR description:
Remove some overlaps coming in the PPS part of Run3 geometry
PR validation:
Tested using the G4 overlap tool
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special