Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First version of nanoDQMIO content #36275

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 1, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

@jfernan2 jfernan2 commented Nov 29, 2021

PR description:

First version of nanoDQMIO data-Tier with a preliminary content based on requests from subsystems interested in doing ML4DC/DQM with the upcoming ReReco of Pilot Test Runs taken in Autumn 2021

Tested with: runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos --command '--procModifiers=dqmPerLSsaving --customise_commands="process.DQMStore.saveByLumi = cms.untracked.bool(True)"'

up to Harvesting step (excluded) since Harvesting is not defined with perLS saving

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36275/26965

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQMServices/Core (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@barvic this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36275/26967

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36275 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36275/26986

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36275 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36275/27038

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36275 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti, @pbo0, @pmandrik can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6652a5/20887/summary.html
COMMIT: c40be2f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-29-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36275/20887/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 41
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3042214
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3042186
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 40 files compared)
  • Checked 175 log files, 37 edm output root files, 41 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

jfernan2 commented Dec 1, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 1, 2021

@jfernan2 since, as far as I understand, this PR is ready to get merged, could you please remove "[RFC]" from the title, then?

@jfernan2 jfernan2 changed the title [RFC] First version of nanoDQMIO content First version of nanoDQMIO content Dec 1, 2021
@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

jfernan2 commented Dec 1, 2021

Sorry, I had forgotten. Done. Thanks

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 1, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants