-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CondTools/HLT
fix mistake done in #36129
#36362
Conversation
type bug-fix |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36362/27119
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-92e5f0/20981/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(outputs of the unit test remain unchanged)
Aesthetics Co-authored-by: Marino Missiroli <m.missiroli@cern.ch>
Not sure what this is supposed to mean, but that's not correct, neither for the log printout (now all IOVs in which the reader enters are printed) nor for the output twiki file (which is not displayed in the log, but is created nonetheless) whose size is greatly reduced. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36362/27123
|
Pull request #36362 was updated. @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
This just referred to the corresponding review comments, i.e. the removal of |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-92e5f0/20983/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt |
+db |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
During the modernization of the code done in PR #36129 the
endJob
method was changed to be anendRun
.This does not reflect how the code was designed originally as the
endJob
was suppposed to call for the very last time theprintMap()
method, only once for very last IOV, not treated yet in the previousbeginRun(..)
s.The combination of this bug + the unit test introduced in PR #36187 creates an output
.twiki
file of 1.3GB.... which now is back to 100k.PR validation:
Run unit tests (
scram b runtests
)if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A