-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
introduce alignment campaign-like unit test for pede
#37211
Conversation
pede
pede
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37211/28813
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testPedeCampaign had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23053/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Since cms-sw/cmsdist#7685 is merged, should the status of this be changed to "ready for review"? |
4055172
to
d0c2a12
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37211/28826
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23077/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/alca-l2 any further thoughts? |
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
@mmusich There seems to be a related IB unit issue after merging this PR. Would you please have a look? Processing allMillePede.C... ---> test test_PixelBaryCentreTool had ERRORS
|
No. This PR has been merged in therefore I conclude that the failure is unrelated. |
Actually it failed even earlier: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/rhel8_amd64_gcc10/CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-12-1100/unitTestLogs/Alignment/TrackerAlignment#/3 ( |
Ok, thanks @mmusich The new IB [CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-15-1100] so far looks good. We will then merge the backported PRs later soon. |
PR description:
As discussed here cms-sw/cmsdist#7660 (comment) introduce a pede execution based off a real (small-scale) MC alignment campaign (cosmics-only). The needed input files to steer the execution are at:
/store/group/alca_global/tkal_millepede_tests/
PR validation:
run
scram b runtests_testPedeCampaign
,but at the moment (for reason that are being investigated) the(The issue, due to a wrong commit for the pede spec file inpede
execution gets stuck (starting fromCMSSW_12_3_0_pre3
onwards), while it run fine in previous pre-releasescmsdist
has been solved in cms-sw/cmsdist#7685)if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
A backport exists, to show the infrastructure is working.