-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GEM alignment in all Run3 GTs and update BeamSpot in Run3 MC GTs #38692
Conversation
test parameters:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38692/30990
|
A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beam_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-mutracking_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-pixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38692/30999
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-gem_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Since the GEM fix for DQM might take a while (see #38666 (comment)) I want to test this PR without that PR. |
test parameters: |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fc0cf/26239/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
@perrotta @cms-sw/alca-l2 merging this PR as is has been a mistake. |
How do we update the Run 3 workflow? (sorry if the question is naive....) |
@francescobrivio here
and elsewhere, where relevant. |
PR description:
In this PR we add:
Realistic25ns13p6TeVEarly2022Collision
introduced in Add VtxSmearing scenario for Run 3 early data at 13.6 TeV #38616The new GEM tags are:
GEMAlignment_hlt_v2
GEMAlignment_express_v2
GEMAlignment_prompt_v2
GEMAlignment_v2
GEMAlignment_MC_v1
GEMAlignment_ideal_MC_v1
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_hlt_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_express_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_prompt_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_MC_v1
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_ideal_MC_v1
The GEMRECO geometry tag is:
GEMRECO_Geometry_v3_hlt
The new BeamSpot tags are:
BeamSpotObjects_Realistic25ns_13p6TeVCollisions_Early2022_v1_mc
BeamSpotOnlineObjects_Realistic25ns_13p6TeVCollisions_Early2022_v1_mc
The new DMD tag is:
DropBoxMetadata_v8_express
GT Diffs:
PR validation:
Tested with
runTheMatrix.py -l 139.001,138.4,138.5,12034.0,11634.0,7.23,159.0,12434.0,12834.0 --ibeos -j 16
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but a 12_4_X backport will be provided soon