-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
modify Run3 PSets for SoftLeptonByMVAComputers instead of individual producers #40485
modify Run3 PSets for SoftLeptonByMVAComputers instead of individual producers #40485
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40485/33665
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AnnikaStein (Annika Stein) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable nano |
assign xpog |
@cmsbuild , please test |
type btv |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/29924/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
@cmsbuild , please test workflow 11634.1 |
Sorry for the delay, joined several meetings today and will follow up asap. With the correct imports, it's almost working but still need to modify the custom nano jme which uses a slightly different strategy than the other cffs. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40485/33728
|
Pull request #40485 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @swertz, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test workflow 11634.15 |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
urgent |
I think that what would have to be reverted is #40445, and that would not be good. Given the urgency, the minimal fix for wf |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/30011/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
As discussed in ORP today, this can be closed since it is superseded by #40539 |
PR description:
As a follow up for #40464 this PR modifies PSets instead of Producers in
RecoBTag/SoftLepton/python/SoftLeptonByMVAComputers_cff.py
because all six following producers use the same PSet and can therefore be treated in one go, as discussed in #40464 (comment) @tvami @francescobrivioPR validation:
Ran basic checks and the particular workflows that were checked in #40464 as well:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: