Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove getManyByType from the Framework #42311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

wddgit
Copy link
Contributor

@wddgit wddgit commented Jul 19, 2023

PR description:

Remove getManyByType from the Framework.

This function has long been deprecated and we have finally removed all uses of this function from the CMSSW repository (except the last calls to the function are removed in PR #42310 which was just submitted, don't merge this one until after that one is merged).

PR validation:

Just deletions, nothing to test.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42311/36335

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @wddgit (W. David Dagenhart) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • FWCore/Framework (core)

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @missirol this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@wddgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

wddgit commented Jul 19, 2023

please test with #42310

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a496df/33783/summary.html
COMMIT: a762911
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-07-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/42311/33783/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test SiStripDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 9 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 53 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3195634
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 225
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3195387
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@wddgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

wddgit commented Jul 19, 2023

please test with #42310

This appears unrelated to the changes in this PR. I think I've seen this before intermittently in the IBs. Try again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a496df/33784/summary.html
COMMIT: a762911
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-07-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/42311/33784/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 21 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3195634
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3195612
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@wddgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

wddgit commented Jul 20, 2023

hold

we need to wait for #42310 to get merged first

@wddgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

wddgit commented Jul 20, 2023

I guess I don't have authority for a real hold, but anyway wait for #42310 to get merged.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

hold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request has been put on hold by @Dr15Jones
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@wddgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

wddgit commented Jul 24, 2023

@Dr15Jones #42310 got merged over the weekend. Can you release the hold? It should be OK to merge this one now.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

unhold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8086f04 into cms-sw:master Jul 24, 2023
@wddgit wddgit deleted the removeGetManyByTypeFromFramework branch August 25, 2023 22:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants