-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding PUPPI jets and METs to offline DQM #44336
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44336/39369
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rseidita for master. It involves the following packages:
@tjavaid, @cmsbuild, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @nothingface0, @antoniovagnerini can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT |
@tjavaid I tried running the following workflows locally: 1001.4 1002.3 1002.4 1001.3 141.901 1001.2 1040.0 140.56 1000.0 1001.0 140.57 140.56 1003.0 Run successfully: 1001.4 1002.3 1002.4 1001.3 141.901 1001.2 1040.0 Fail because raw files are on tape: Fail because DAS query at step0 fails:
Assuming I'm testing the correct things, I don't see issues in the execution of the actual code. Please let me know if I'm looking in the wrong place |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-35c537/38896/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Hi @rseidita, @AdrianoDee , I am wondering whether changes to |
Hi @tjavaid, I can't open the links apparently, did you use the "Link me" feature of the DQM GUI? |
Regardless, this PR only touches files in the |
Thanks @tjavaid, the links work now. Looking at the logs, I see that the difference is in the HLT results for some events:
Could this be due to a change in ECAL laser corrections? My changes are entirely restricted to the JetMET offline DQM sequence, so I don't see how they can have anything to do with trigger results and/or the muon/L1T DQM sequence. Are we sure that the tests were run on exactly matching conditions? |
Differences for |
urgent
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Adding the PUPPI collection for both jets and METs to the offline DQM JetMET sequence, as presented here.
PR validation:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport