-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introducing DIGInoHLT
+ HLTOnly
Steps
#44964
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44964/40237
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@subirsarkar, @sunilUIET, @miquork, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelValsValueError: Undefined workflows: 15624.701, 15834.402, 15834.0 |
test parameters:
|
please test |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-INPUTComparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ee050a/39408/summary.html
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ | |||
'2022HIRP', #RawPrime | |||
'2023HI', | |||
'2023HIRP', #RawPrime | |||
'2024HLTOnDigi', | |||
'2024HLTOnDigiPU' | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need space here? Maybe it can be fixed later when new workflow comes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really, right. Let me fix it in one of the other PRs I have or will open on upgrade wfs.
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR proposes the introduction of a set of workflows where HLT is run separately from the DIGI step. This expands the
*.601
wf approach allowing to have any 2024 wf, also the special ones. For the moment it's limited to 2024 (with2024HLTOnDigi
and2024HLTOnDigiPU
) but could be expanded further. From our (PdmV) point of view it would ease the submission of reHLT wfs with the RelVal machine.An example here for
15834.0
.PR validation:
Running, e.g.,
15624.701
15834.0
and15834.402
wfs.