Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca249 Modify calibration macros to use the current IsoTrack calibration #46410

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Oct 16, 2024

PR description:

Modify calibration macros to use the current IsoTrack calibration. We introduce a new mode (truncate flag 9) in place of its earlier implementation. We have a new depth-dependent IsoTrack calibration where parameters for depth = 1 and 2 are kept the same

PR validation:

Use the macros for the current IsoTrack analysis

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 16, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos (alca)

@atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @rsreds, @tocheng, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46410/42259

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #46410 was updated. @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please check and sign again.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Size: This PR adds an extra 96KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-916676/42242/summary.html
COMMIT: 88fab0d
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-15-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46410/42242/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 2022.1010012022.101001_RunEGamma2022C_10k/step1_dasquery.log
  • 2023.0000012023.000001_RunMuonEG2023C_10k/step1_dasquery.log
  • 2023.0010012023.001001_RunDisplacedJet2023C_10k/step1_dasquery.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...
  • 2023.100001
  • 2022.101001
  • 2023.000001
  • 2023.001001
  • 2023.100001

Comparison Summary

Summary:

else
depth = 1;
}
//Depths 1 and 2 considered as depth = 1; rest of the depths are kept as it is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment does not correspond to what is implemented in the code (it should be

Suggested change
//Depths 1 and 2 considered as depth = 1; rest of the depths are kept as it is
//Depths 1 and 2 considered as depth = 2; rest of the depths are kept as it is

instead)

And in any case the implementation here is quite different from what was before: please check and explain what was updated in HB and HE that requires this change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like to have the same constants for depths 1 and 2 otherwise depth-dependent constants. The comment is changed as suggested

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #46410 was updated. @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please check and sign again.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda just to be clear, this PR changes the implementation as follows

=== HB moved from

depth_current depth_withPR
     1            1
     2            2
     3            2
     4            2

to

depth_current depth_withPR
     1            2
     2            2
     3            3
     4            4

=== HE moved from

depth_current depth_withPR
     1            1
     2            2
     3            3
     4            4

to

depth_current depth_withPR
     1            2
     2            2
     3            3
     4            4

I assume that this is what you want, but since it is not explained anywhere in the PR description please confirm (even better if you can link where in the "current IsoTrack calibration" this is implemented).

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@perrotta I tried to explain in the description now

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 96KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-916676/42268/summary.html
COMMIT: 67a9557
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-16-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46410/42268/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 44
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3335129
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 458
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3334651
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 43 files compared)
  • Checked 193 log files, 163 edm output root files, 44 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6c9b76b into cms-sw:master Oct 18, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants