-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change pip downloading sources to pypi instead of via pip itself #175
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for branch V00-33-XX. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
for file in data["releases"][pack.split('=')[2]]: | ||
if file["packagetype"] == "sdist": | ||
url=file["url"] | ||
if url is not None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if url is not None: | |
if url: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems is not None is the more standard formulation.. "Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or is not, never the equality operators."
hi @mrodozov @smuzaffar -aside from the small fix suggested above, any other comments on this? |
it says draft so I thought you still have work on it |
I can remove draft indeed - It works at the level I’ve tested it anyway:)
… On Apr 27, 2021, at 10:44 AM, Mircho Rodozov ***@***.***> wrote:
it says draft so I thought you still have work on it
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
@davidlange6 , I am also testing it locally by forcing re-build of all pip based packages and re-download of sources . I will get back once testing is done |
Cool - thanks - btw, how does one force a redownload of spruces? I failed to figure that out...
… On Apr 27, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
@davidlange6 , I am also testing it locally by forcing re-build of all pip based packages and re-download of sources . I will get back once testing is done
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
you need to change the url checksum. I did it by changing
[a]
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next V00-33-XX IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6f3442/14610/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
33-xx version of #174