-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add proposal for Flux at Google Season of Docs 2023 #875
Conversation
Thanks for the proposal! We are looking at the best way to manage several proposals with the GSoD program (https://groups.google.com/g/season-of-docs-discuss/c/PxTWKQfblLc). We'll keep you updated and review this proposal regardless of how GSoD suggests we proceed. |
This is my first time working with this program too 🙂 |
As per the Google PMs comments about org applications:
We ask that you submit this project proposal directly with GSoD, rather than going through us (the CNCF). Sorry for the confusion around this @dholbach. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the proposal @dholbach
I've added some comments.
I am not super experienced with GSoD, but I checked 2 successful applications and did some comparison:
- https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/f110b95dc021d747ad6d9e3b1c3f76a31ca46c88/Documentation/contributing/development/season_of_docs.rst
- https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/RES/2022+Google+Season+of+Docs
First thing I noticed is that they are following the template almost 100%.
I think it is a good idea.
Also, at this stage, Flux community would be convincing Google to give them the opportunity to hire a technical writer. So, what Google wants to see and how they want to see is important.
I would be happy to do a second round of reviews later on
@dholbach Even though the the application needs to happen individually by Flux community, I would be happy to review the proposal again, if you would like me to. |
@nate-double-u @aliok Thanks so much for the reviews, I will dive into this today and send an update again! |
This was a very helpful review, @aliok As Flux will need to apply on its own, would you still like the proposal to be kept in this repository? |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Holbach <daniel@weave.works>
Closing this PR as this proposal has been published over on the fluxcd.io website. Good luck @dholbach! |
I should say, that just because the proposal isn't kept in this repo, doesn't mean we're not following along! Please keep us up to date with how this goes - we're rooting for you! |
@dholbach Great stuff! Just had a quick look, it looks great! I hope your proposal gets accepted. UPDATE: I have 1 minor comment: fluxcd/website#1425 (review) |
I tried to follow the template and took inspiration from other applications. Please let me know if anything is missing or could be explained better, also if the project scope is too wide/narrow or the budget idea is off. We appreciate advice from folks who participated in the project before - it's our first time! :-)