-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the default number of CPUs #1839
Conversation
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ func TestClientGossip(t *testing.T) { | |||
rpcContext := rpc.NewContext(&base.Context{Insecure: true}, lclock, stopper) | |||
client.start(local, disconnected, rpcContext, stopper) | |||
|
|||
util.SucceedsWithin(t, 500*time.Millisecond, func() error { | |||
util.SucceedsWithin(t, 5*time.Minute, func() error { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why that high?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i was debugging, see second commit
OK, I think this once again ready for prime time. There are 5 tests being suppressed here.
I think this is about as good as we're gonna get, assuming we're ok with the 5 suppressions. @tschottdorf @bdarnell could you both please weigh in? everyone else is welcome to comment as well, of course. |
I think we should merge them. Ultimately the "big ones" here have @bdarnell's name on it so he should weigh in, but according to @tamird all test errors are reproducible locally (with sufficient iteration), so we're not losing much by skipping the tests in CI as long as we prioritize the corresponding issues accordingly. Plus, the introduction of new flaky tests has pretty much kept up with the rate at which we can fix them, and @tamird has sisyphus'ed it for long enough. |
I agree we should go ahead and merge this even if we have to skip some tests, but four failures out of ten is still unacceptably high. Looks like TestTxnDBLostUpdateAnomaly should also be skipped, and maybe something in |
I don't think these are representative results, so I'm running 10 more builds (prior to this batch of 10, I had hardly seen |
OK, 6 of those 10 failed:
10 more builds are now running. |
10 for 10, merging |
This reverts commit 30b6050.