Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add osqp support #52

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 6, 2021
Merged

Add osqp support #52

merged 9 commits into from
Jun 6, 2021

Conversation

traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

@traversaro traversaro commented Jun 5, 2021

Fix #51 . Uses casadi/casadi#2671 by @GiulioRomualdi .

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@traversaro traversaro changed the title [WIP] Add osqp support Add osqp support Jun 5, 2021
@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2021

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.
I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like I wasn't able to push to the patch-6
branch of traversaro/casadi-feedstock. Did you check the "Allow edits from maintainers" box?

NOTE: PRs from organization accounts cannot be rerendered because of GitHub
permissions.

Copy link
Contributor

@pariterre pariterre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
Good job! Should I merge?

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM!
Good job! Should I merge?

Thanks! Yes it seems ready to be merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enable WITH_OSQP option
3 participants