-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
back to autotools build on unix for now #130
Conversation
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
2b886e1
to
a791734
Compare
script: build-lib.sh # [unix] | ||
script: build-shared.sh # [unix] | ||
# cmake script currently disabled due to compatibility issues with | ||
# existing builds; see #49 for potential solution, or switch with 3.22 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Switching with 3.22 is not a good idea. We want to be able to switch between cmake and autotools build if the need arises. Therefore #49 is the best way forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see this comment. Upstream already aligned the names and soversions, but it still broke.
I also don't see the benefit of being able to switch back to autotools. It just a large surface for breakage for very little gain AFAICT, especially now that upstream has graduated CMake to first class citizen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see this #68 (comment).
I know. Please see my comment on #49 about fixing protobuf_SO_VERSION
and other variables.
I also don't see the benefit of being able to switch back to autotools. It just a large surface for breakage for very little gain AFAICT, especially now that upstream has graduated CMake to first class citizen.
AFAICT, CMake was not a first class citizen up-to-now. If that becomes the default installation, that is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upstream already aligned the names and soversions, but it still broke.
Yes, it was done by someone without a good understanding of how autotools works. I specifically added a feature to CMake to make it easier to replicate autotools behaviour because of protobuf.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAICT, CMake was not a first class citizen up-to-now. If that becomes the default installation, that is fine.
That is how I interpret protocolbuffers/protobuf#9596
FYI, autotools was removed completely from the upcoming v3.22. Salient quote:
|
Undo effects of #128, see post-merge discussion there.