-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Be more explicit about the port part of a certificate directory #369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mtrmac
wants to merge
1
commit into
containers:main
Choose a base branch
from
mtrmac:certs-port
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s not actually correct - if users
pull registry.example.com:443/…
, the directory must be namedregistry.example.com:443
.443
/80
are not special for this purpose.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, right. I still find the proposal can cause confusion (one interpretation being that the
:port
is optional.How about using "
prefix
", "registry
" or "location
" instead of "host
[:port
]" - which would reuse notation fromcontainers-registries.conf
docs and indicating that the following explanation is required reading?(Aside: Elsewhere it seems that
hostname:port
is used more thanhost:port
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We typically use “prefix” to include
registry.example/namespace1/namespace2
.registry
is not specific about having a port port.location
is too vague (and used inregistries.conf
as a physical counterpart toprefix
).Either way, users ~need to read the second sentence. (And as a general rule, I don’t think it makes sense to try to structure reference documentation for users who might stop reading at any end of a sentence. Sure, tutorials or blog posts can be more concise, or laser-focused on a single use case. This is not a tutorial.)