-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(staking): use validator & address codecs in staking #16958
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3cf7e9b
sdk.Accaddress -> String
tac0turtle 0aaf01d
minor cleanup
tac0turtle 3ffb3fe
Merge branch 'main' into marko/delegatorAddress_string
tac0turtle 82d4e61
fix sims
tac0turtle 69bdeaf
Merge branch 'main' into marko/delegatorAddress_string
tac0turtle e0640a8
migrate GetVallAddress to string
tac0turtle 92096fd
alt type
tac0turtle 6b2c930
valaddress codec in dist
tac0turtle 6214875
pull in vall addresscodec
tac0turtle 0f66d1b
fix build
tac0turtle 656e6ab
fix linting
tac0turtle d472036
fix distribution tests
tac0turtle 989d6fe
do not call .String in newdelegation
tac0turtle 10460de
fix tests
tac0turtle e4ae428
fix err hoisting
tac0turtle 90915e7
cleanup form review
tac0turtle 99aac9a
changelog entry
tac0turtle cf7224f
Merge branch 'main' into marko/delegatorAddress_string
tac0turtle c645284
update comments in proto
tac0turtle b9d96c3
linting fix
tac0turtle File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i can migrate this one once we merge #16959, that way this interface is consistent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tac0turtle why not use bytes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would need to do a state migration, this bled into state, we will get rid of it in the next release or the upcoming rewrite of staking