Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Error on blank chain-id in multisign command (backport #9593) #9605

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 30, 2021

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jun 29, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9593 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of f65b6c9 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/release/v0.42.x/pr-9593
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/release/v0.42.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit f65b6c936.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   x/auth/client/cli/tx_multisign.go

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   CHANGELOG.md

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/

Error on `tx multisign` command if chain-id is blank. This is a common cause of signature verification failures when combining signatures and the error message doesn't provide any clues to this common cause.

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit f65b6c9)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
@mergify mergify bot added the conflicts label Jun 29, 2021
@amaury1093 amaury1093 added this to the v0.42.7 milestone Jun 29, 2021
@amaury1093 amaury1093 merged commit 6c49c4a into release/v0.42.x Jun 30, 2021
@amaury1093 amaury1093 deleted the mergify/bp/release/v0.42.x/pr-9593 branch June 30, 2021 13:10
Raumo0 pushed a commit to mapofzones/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2022
* Fixed parse key issue (backport cosmos#9299) (cosmos#9561)

* Fixed parse key issue (cosmos#9299)

* Fixed parse key issue

* Added getconfig in root command

* uncommented changes in parse.go

(cherry picked from commit d7dd1d7)

# Conflicts:
#	simapp/simd/cmd/root.go

* Add changelog

Co-authored-by: Prathyusha Lakkireddy <prathyusha@vitwit.com>
Co-authored-by: Amaury M <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat: return trace value from baseapp (backport cosmos#9578) (cosmos#9580)

* feat: return trace value from baseapp (cosmos#9578)

## Description

Closes: #XXXX

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

* fix: Dumping upgrade info interrupted by cosmovisor (cosmos#9384) (cosmos#9608)

Solution:
- dumping upgrade info before emit `UPGRADED NEEDED` log which will
  cause cosmovisor to kill chain process

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

## Description

The problematic procedure:

1. chain process output UPGRADE NEEDED log
2. cosmovisor see the message and kill the chain binary
3. chain process dump upgrade info and panic itself

the step 2 and 3 runs concurrently, so the dumping process can be interrupted by cosmovisor's terminate signal. The proposed solution is to dump upgrade info before emitting the log.
there are two problematic situation:
1. the upgrade info file is created, but content is not written or flushed before killed, when the chain process restart, it'll panic because of json parsing error.
2. the upgrade info file is not created at all, when the chain process restart, the [store upgrades](https://github.com/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/blob/master/app/app.go#L436) are not activated, will cause app hash mismatch error later on.

* feat: Error on blank chain-id in multisign command (backport cosmos#9593) (cosmos#9605)

* feat: Error on blank chain-id in multisign command (cosmos#9593)

Error on `tx multisign` command if chain-id is blank. This is a common cause of signature verification failures when combining signatures and the error message doesn't provide any clues to this common cause.

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit f65b6c9)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* fix conflicts

* less change diff

Co-authored-by: Zaki Manian <zaki@manian.org>
Co-authored-by: Amaury M <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>

* x/capability: Cap Initialization Fix (cosmos#9392)

* fix: correct ibc metric labels (cosmos#9645)

* backport cosmos/ibc-go#223

* add changelog

* fix unnecessary changes

* fix: Fix IBC Transfer Event (cosmos#9640)

* fix event type

* CHANGELOG

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Amaury M <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: v0.42.7 release notes & changelog (cosmos#9661)

* chore: v0.42.7 release notes & changelog

* Add ibc

* fix(keyring): update keyring for kwallet fix (backport cosmos#9563) (cosmos#9579)

* fix(keyring): update keyring for kwallet fix (cosmos#9563)

## Description

Closes: cosmos#9562

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Prathyusha Lakkireddy <prathyusha@vitwit.com>
Co-authored-by: Amaury M <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zaki Manian <zaki@manian.org>
Co-authored-by: Aditya <adityasripal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: colin axnér <25233464+colin-axner@users.noreply.github.com>
faddat pushed a commit to osmosis-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
) (cosmos#9605)

* feat: Error on blank chain-id in multisign command (cosmos#9593)

Error on `tx multisign` command if chain-id is blank. This is a common cause of signature verification failures when combining signatures and the error message doesn't provide any clues to this common cause.

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit f65b6c9)

* fix conflicts

* less change diff

Co-authored-by: Zaki Manian <zaki@manian.org>
Co-authored-by: Amaury M <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants