Skip to content

Conversation

@gjermundgaraba
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: IBCGO-2338
closes: #8378


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Include changelog entry when appropriate (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog).
  • Wrote unit and integration tests if relevant.
  • Updated documentation (docs/) if anything is changed.
  • Added godoc comments if relevant.
  • Self-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jun 21, 2025

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba requested a review from Copilot June 21, 2025 10:03

This comment was marked as outdated.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.96970% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.00%. Comparing base (16eb140) to head (28828e4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...es/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/forward.go 97.47% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...s/apps/packet-forward-middleware/ibc_middleware.go 80.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8555       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   17.66%   58.00%   +40.33%     
===========================================
  Files          28      317      +289     
  Lines        2711    22743    +20032     
===========================================
+ Hits          479    13191    +12712     
- Misses       2205     8948     +6743     
- Partials       27      604      +577     
Flag Coverage Δ
08-wasm 65.99% <ø> (ø)
e2e 1.13% <ø> (ø)
ibc-go 63.45% <96.96%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba requested a review from Copilot June 22, 2025 12:44

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor

@DeshErBojhaa DeshErBojhaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great PR. Robust implementation of ser/de.

Approving this as the only comment I have is a non blocker.

return im.app.OnAcknowledgementPacket(ctx, sourceClient, destinationClient, sequence, acknowledgement, payload, relayer)
}

// TODO: Something looks off about this, please review carefully
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will you do this in this pr?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I just added it because I happened to come across it.

Copy link
Contributor

@AdityaSripal AdityaSripal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved modulo codecov

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba requested a review from Copilot June 26, 2025 15:17
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the orderedmap dependency and refactors the packet-forward middleware to use native maps and time.Duration, updating associated tests and usage across the codebase.

  • Eliminated all imports and usage of github.com/iancoleman/orderedmap.
  • Refactored PacketMetadata/ForwardMetadata to use native Go types and helper methods (ToMap, ToMemo).
  • Updated tests and IBC middleware to use the new ToMemo API and time.Duration instead of custom JSON wrappers.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 18 out of 22 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
simapp/go.mod & modules/**/go.mod Removed orderedmap from module dependencies
modules/apps/rate-limiting/v2/ibc_middleware.go Minor TODO addition
modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/keys.go Added new metadata key constants
modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/forward.go Removed JSONObject/orderedmap, implemented native maps
modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/forward_test.go Expanded tests for new API and increased coverage
modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/keeper/*.go & tests Adjusted ForwardTransferPacket signature and memo handling
modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/ibc_middleware.go Updated OnRecvPacket to use GetPacketMetadataFromPacketdata
e2e/tests/packet_forward_middleware/**/*.go Updated E2E tests to use ToMemo and removed orderedmap use
go.mod Removed orderedmap globally
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/forward.go:35

  • The Validate method calls errors.New but the standard "errors" package is not imported. Add import "errors" or replace with errorsmod.New.
func (m ForwardMetadata) Validate() error {

modules/apps/packet-forward-middleware/types/forward.go:84

  • json.Marshal is used but the "encoding/json" package is not imported. Add import "encoding/json".
	packetMetadataJSON, err := json.Marshal(packetMetadataMap)

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba merged commit 4d99a06 into main Jun 26, 2025
52 checks passed
@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba deleted the gjermund/remove-orderedmap-dep branch June 26, 2025 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decide how to deal with OrderedMap depencency

4 participants