Problem: fail to push testground image

[mmsqe]

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

rename testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase

PR Checklist:

• Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Transitioned to benchmarking functionalities, replacing previous testground functionalities.
  • Updated Docker image to run the new benchmarking executable.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed outdated transaction sending logic, simplifying load testing processes.

• Refactor

  • Renamed relevant entities to align with the new benchmarking structure.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve a transition from testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase across multiple files, including flake.nix, nix/testground-image.nix, testground/benchmark/benchmark/sendtx.py, and testground/benchmark/overlay.nix. This includes updates to package references, Docker image configurations, and the removal of specific functions related to transaction sending. The modifications reflect a shift in focus towards benchmarking functionalities, with corresponding adjustments in the development environment and exported entities.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
flake.nix, nix/testground-image.nix	Transitioned from testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase, updating paths and build inputs accordingly.
testground/benchmark/benchmark/sendtx.py	Removed the generate_load function, indicating a shift away from multi-threaded transaction sending.
testground/benchmark/overlay.nix	Renamed testground-testcase and testground-testcase-env to benchmark-testcase and benchmark-testcase-env.

Possibly related PRs

• Problem: no cluster benchmarking #1431: This PR integrates Testground for network benchmarking and modifies the Docker image building process, which aligns with the changes in the main PR that transition from testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase in the Docker image configuration.

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
From testground's shadow, new paths loom.
Benchmarking now takes the stage,
With each update, we turn the page.
Hopping forward, we embrace the light,
In code we trust, our future is bright! 🌟

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30d6fd8 and 1936570.

Files selected for processing (5)

• flake.nix (1 hunks)
• nix/testground-image.nix (2 hunks)
• testground/benchmark/benchmark/sendtx.py (0 hunks)
• testground/benchmark/flake.nix (1 hunks)
• testground/benchmark/overlay.nix (1 hunks)

Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)

• testground/benchmark/benchmark/sendtx.py

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• testground/benchmark/overlay.nix

Additional comments not posted (7)

nix/testground-image.nix (2)

18-18: LGTM!

Adding benchmark-testcase to the Docker image contents aligns with the PR objective and is necessary to make it available in the container.

---

24-24: Please clarify the purpose of the /bin/stateless-testcase command.

The Cmd directive is changed to run /bin/stateless-testcase when the container starts. However, this command is not mentioned in the PR objectives or the summary of changes.

Could you please provide more context on:

1. What is the purpose of the /bin/stateless-testcase command?
2. How does it relate to the benchmarking functionality introduced in this PR?

Ensuring that the correct command is executed is crucial for the container to function as intended.

testground/benchmark/flake.nix (4)

70-70: LGTM!

The change to the program path for the default app is approved. It correctly points to the stateless-testcase binary from the benchmark-testcase package, which aligns with the overall transition to benchmarking functionalities.

---

74-74: LGTM!

The change to the program path for the stateless-testcase app is approved. It correctly points to the stateless-testcase binary from the benchmark-testcase package, which aligns with the overall transition to benchmarking functionalities.

---

78-78: LGTM!

The change to the buildInputs for the default development shell is approved. It correctly includes the benchmark-testcase-env package, which aligns with the overall transition to benchmarking functionalities.

---

66-66: Verify the package reference change in the codebase.

The change from pkgs.testground-testcase to pkgs.benchmark-testcase for the default package is approved. This change aligns with the overall transition from testground to benchmarking functionalities.

Please ensure that all references to pkgs.testground-testcase have been updated consistently across the codebase to pkgs.benchmark-testcase. You can use the following script to verify:

Verification successful

---

Package reference change successfully verified

The change from pkgs.testground-testcase to pkgs.benchmark-testcase has been consistently implemented across the codebase. No references to the old package name remain, and the new package name is used appropriately in various contexts.

Key findings:

• The new package reference pkgs.benchmark-testcase is present in multiple files, including flake.nix and testground/benchmark/flake.nix.
• No occurrences of the old package name testground-testcase were found.
• Related changes include the introduction of benchmark-testcase-env, suggesting a comprehensive update to the benchmarking infrastructure.

This verification confirms that the package reference change has been thoroughly applied, aligning with the project's apparent shift towards benchmarking functionality.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `pkgs.testground-testcase` have been updated to `pkgs.benchmark-testcase`.

# Test: Search for the old package reference. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type nix $'pkgs\.testground-testcase'

Length of output: 43

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package reference changes and test rg functionality

# Test 1: Verify rg is working by searching for a common Nix keyword
echo "Test 1: Searching for 'pkgs' keyword"
rg --type nix 'pkgs'

# Test 2: Search for the new package reference
echo "Test 2: Searching for new package reference"
rg --type nix 'pkgs\.benchmark-testcase'

# Test 3: Broader search for old package name
echo "Test 3: Broader search for old package name"
rg --type nix 'testground-testcase'

# Test 4: Broader search for new package name
echo "Test 4: Broader search for new package name"
rg --type nix 'benchmark-testcase'

Length of output: 9984

flake.nix (1)

47-47: Verify the impact of the package change on the stateless-testcase app.

The change from testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase for the stateless-testcase app looks good. However, please ensure that:

1. The benchmark-testcase package provides the necessary functionality for the stateless-testcase app.
2. The stateless-testcase app remains compatible with the rest of the system after this change.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility and functionality of the stateless-testcase app:

Verification successful

---

Verification successful: Package change correctly implemented

The change from testground-testcase to benchmark-testcase for the stateless-testcase app has been successfully implemented and is consistent across the codebase. Key findings:

1. The benchmark-testcase package is properly defined and referenced in all relevant Nix files.
2. The stateless-testcase binary is correctly referenced as part of the benchmark-testcase package.
3. The nix/testground-image.nix file has been updated to use the new benchmark-testcase package.
4. No references to the old testground-testcase package remain in the Nix files.

This change appears to be complete and consistent, maintaining compatibility with the rest of the system.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the compatibility and functionality of the `stateless-testcase` app.

# Test 1: Check if the `stateless-testcase` binary exists in the `benchmark-testcase` package.
fd --type f --regex 'stateless-testcase$' nix/benchmark-testcase

# Test 2: Search for any potential compatibility issues or errors related to the `stateless-testcase` app.
rg --type nix -i 'stateless-testcase' -A 5

Length of output: 1514

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the 'benchmark-testcase' package and the 'stateless-testcase' binary

# Check for the existence of the 'benchmark-testcase' package
rg --type nix 'benchmark-testcase' -A 5

# Search for the definition or derivation of the 'benchmark-testcase' package
rg --type nix 'benchmark-testcase\s*=' -A 10

# Check the content of 'nix/testground-image.nix'
cat nix/testground-image.nix

# Search for any other occurrences of 'testground-testcase' to ensure it's fully replaced
rg --type nix 'testground-testcase'

Length of output: 3292

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.24%. Comparing base (30d6fd8) to head (1936570).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (30d6fd8) and HEAD (1936570). Click for more details.

HEAD has 12 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (30d6fd8)	HEAD (1936570)
	2	0
integration_tests	20	10

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1594       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   36.12%   15.24%   -20.89%     
===========================================
  Files          97       67       -30     
  Lines        7725     4874     -2851     
===========================================
- Hits         2791      743     -2048     
+ Misses       4585     4037      -548     
+ Partials      349       94      -255     

see 47 files with indirect coverage changes