Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More dav unit tests #3461

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022
Merged

More dav unit tests #3461

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022

Conversation

butonic
Copy link
Contributor

@butonic butonic commented Nov 14, 2022

brings ocdav coverage to 16.8%

Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic marked this pull request as draft November 14, 2022 14:09
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic force-pushed the more-dav-unit-tests branch 2 times, most recently from a7d20b1 to 85d34f4 Compare November 14, 2022 16:44
…ror cases

Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@butonic butonic self-assigned this Nov 14, 2022
@butonic butonic marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2022 17:15
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Copy link
Contributor

@aduffeck aduffeck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM besides the nitpicks

Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
@labkode
Copy link
Member

labkode commented Nov 15, 2022

@butonic could you add to master as well?

@labkode labkode closed this Nov 15, 2022
@labkode labkode reopened this Nov 15, 2022
@aduffeck
Copy link
Contributor

😍 lgtm

@butonic butonic merged commit 8c4890d into cs3org:edge Nov 23, 2022
@butonic butonic deleted the more-dav-unit-tests branch November 23, 2022 15:09
@butonic
Copy link
Contributor Author

butonic commented Nov 23, 2022

@labkode we started refactoring the error handling, the added tests make use of the error returned by the handlers ... we also moved to ginkgo/v2 ... urgh ... so I cannot even just add the test because they make use of DescribeTable which is only in ginkgo v2 ...

most of these cases are covered by the acceptance tests, we just want to develop unit tests to improve the coverage and then refactor the handlers further.

@kobergj kobergj mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants