Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-6869 tests: Fix large_file_count.py in weekly run (#4744) #4783

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

saurabhtandan
Copy link
Contributor

Fix large_file_count.py in weekly run

Test-tag-hw-large: pr,hw,large largefilecount

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Tandan saurabh.tandan@intel.com

Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/1/execution/node/337/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/1/execution/node/364/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/1/execution/node/367/log

Fix large_file_count.py in weekly run
Test-tag-hw-large: pr,hw,large largefilecount

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Tandan <saurabh.tandan@intel.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/2/execution/node/1530/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Small completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/3/execution/node/482/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/3/execution/node/530/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/3/execution/node/693/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4783/3/execution/node/775/log

Test-tag-hw-large: pr,hw,large largefilecount
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

FYI: Errors found in lines not modified in the patch:

src/tests/ftest/io/large_file_count.py:12:
(pylint-too-many-ancestors) Too many ancestors (10/7)

@saurabhtandan saurabhtandan requested review from sylviachanoiyee and a team March 3, 2021 17:40
@saurabhtandan
Copy link
Contributor Author

saurabhtandan commented Mar 3, 2021

Failing issues are unrelated to the changes made in this pr.
LLNL/romio: DAOS-6905
PoolCreateTest: DAOS-6932
ErasureCodeIor: DAOS-6788
DaosCoreTestRebuild: DAOS-6840

@sylviachanoiyee sylviachanoiyee merged commit a79d7c2 into release/1.2 Mar 4, 2021
@sylviachanoiyee sylviachanoiyee deleted the DAOS-6869_1.2 branch March 4, 2021 05:35
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2021
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request May 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants