-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-6731 sdl: Fix coverity defect in CaRT IV server test #4793
Conversation
Fixes unused value defect in cart iv server functional test. Signed-off-by: Sydney Vanda <sydney.m.vanda@intel.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.
Test stage Functional_Hardware_Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4793/1/execution/node/1531/log |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.
confirmed the defect (290819) is resolved in recent run with this patch https://scan8.coverity.com/reports.htm#v39476/p12225 |
Test stage Functional_Hardware_Small completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4793/2/execution/node/1387/log |
Test stage Functional_Hardware_Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4793/2/execution/node/1401/log |
Test stage Functional_Hardware_Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4793/2/execution/node/1454/log |
Test stage Functional on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4793/2/execution/node/1526/log |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kind of weird, I see assert() and D_ASSERT() used in this same function. Seems like assert() is used more often than D_ASSERT(), so this looks good to me.
Thanks for fixing this.
I noticed that as well, just figured I would stay consistent |
Fixes unused value defect in cart iv server functional test. Signed-off-by: Sydney Vanda <sydney.m.vanda@intel.com>
Fixes unused value defect in cart iv server functional test.
Signed-off-by: Sydney Vanda sydney.m.vanda@intel.com