Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-6929 Java: Update Hadoop dependency from 3.1.3 to 3.2.2 (#4844) #4870

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2021

Conversation

dpquigl
Copy link
Contributor

@dpquigl dpquigl commented Mar 5, 2021

Snyk updated its recommendation again to upgrade from 3.1.3 to 3.2.1 so we are
updating to the latest which is 3.2.2

Signed-off-by: David Quigley david.quigley@intel.com

Master-PR: #4844

Snyk updated its recommendation again to upgrade from 3.1.3 to 3.2.1 so we are
updating to the latest which is 3.2.2

Signed-off-by: David Quigley <david.quigley@intel.com>
@dpquigl dpquigl requested review from mjmac and a team March 5, 2021 04:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@johannlombardi johannlombardi requested a review from jiafuzha March 5, 2021 08:02
Copy link
Contributor

@jiafuzha jiafuzha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good.

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Scan CentOS 7 RPMs completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4870/1/execution/node/1161/log

@mjmac mjmac merged commit f7de263 into release/1.2 Mar 5, 2021
@mjmac mjmac deleted the dpquigl/haoop-latest-1.2 branch March 5, 2021 18:45
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2021
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request May 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants