Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-6965 Test: Increased the SCM size as recent layout change need more space with current dataset. #5228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2021

Conversation

ravalsam
Copy link
Contributor

The test is failing because of SCM size target size is getting low 9MB with the dataset.
This test has no requirement to use low size so increase enough so the test
should not fail with ENOSPACE.
Updated test to use PCMEM instead of using tmpfs.

Quick-build: true
Test-tag: nvme_object_multiple_pools

Signed-off-by: Samir Raval samir.raval@intel.com

Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Unit Test with memcheck completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-5228/1/execution/node/523/log

…ore space with current dataset. (#4928)

Test is failing because of SCM size target size is getting low 9MB with dataset.
This test has no requirement to use low size so increase enough so test
should not fail with ENOSPACE.
Updated test to use PCMEM instead of using tmpfs.

Quick-build: true
Skip-unit-tests: true
Skip-unit-test-memcheck: true
Test-tag: nvme_object_multiple_pools

Signed-off-by: Samir Raval <samir.raval@intel.com>
@ravalsam ravalsam force-pushed the samirrav/DAOS-6965-1.2 branch from 4957990 to 446db1f Compare March 29, 2021 23:57
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@ravalsam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copy link
Contributor

@rpadma2 rpadma2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@mjean308 mjean308 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ravalsam ravalsam requested a review from a team March 30, 2021 21:01
@sylviachanoiyee sylviachanoiyee merged commit f6ad814 into release/1.2 Mar 31, 2021
@sylviachanoiyee sylviachanoiyee deleted the samirrav/DAOS-6965-1.2 branch March 31, 2021 03:37
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2021
@ashleypittman ashleypittman mentioned this pull request May 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants