Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for per actor configuration #2334

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

halspang
Copy link
Contributor

@halspang halspang commented Apr 6, 2022

Description

This commit includes documentation on how to set the per type
actor configuration. This is currently not supported in any SDK
so an example is provided using raw Go.

#2176

Signed-off-by: Hal Spang halspang@microsoft.com

Issue reference

Closes: #2176

@halspang halspang requested review from a team as code owners April 6, 2022 18:52
@msfussell
Copy link
Member

@halspang - Can you raise the issues needed in each SDK to implement this feature?
This is a minimal start, but I suggest that we spend time in the next release adding this into the SDKs.

@halspang
Copy link
Contributor Author

halspang commented Apr 7, 2022

@halspang - Can you raise the issues needed in each SDK to implement this feature? This is a minimal start, but I suggest that we spend time in the next release adding this into the SDKs.

Can do, current actor SDKs are:

  • .NET
  • Java
  • Python
  • JS
  • Go

And anything else? I feel like there was at least one more inflight.

@msfussell
Copy link
Member

msfussell commented Apr 7, 2022

@halspang - Added a few comments, which I forgot to publish

This commit includes documentation on how to set the per type
actor configuration. This is currently not supported in any SDK
so an example is provided using raw Go.

dapr#2176

Signed-off-by: Hal Spang <halspang@microsoft.com>
@msfussell msfussell added this to the 1.7 milestone Apr 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@msfussell msfussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants