Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rotation of the inertia reference frame is not considered by the URDF loader #47

Closed
tobiaskunz opened this issue Mar 5, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Rotation of the inertia reference frame is not considered by the URDF loader #47

tobiaskunz opened this issue Mar 5, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ana-GT
Labels
priority: medium should be resolved before the next release type: bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior
Milestone
DART 5.0.0

Comments

@tobiaskunz
Copy link
Contributor

We don't need a place to store it in DART. We just need to transform the inertia matrix accordingly.
@ghost ghost assigned ana-GT Mar 5, 2013
@jslee02 jslee02 added this to the Release DART 4.0 milestone Mar 17, 2014
@jslee02 jslee02 modified the milestones: Release DART 4.1, Release DART 4.0 May 28, 2014
@jslee02 jslee02 modified the milestones: Release DART 5.0, Release DART 4.0.1 Jul 2, 2014
@jslee02 jslee02 modified the milestones: Release DART (15.06), Release DART 4.3 Jan 2, 2015
@mxgrey
Copy link
Member

mxgrey commented Feb 3, 2015

This issue is now addressed in pull request #326

jslee02 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2015
@jslee02
Merge pull request #326 from dartsim/grey/urdf_fixes
8cf6ac6 
Fixing issue #47 and adding PlanarJoint support for URDFs
@mxgrey mxgrey closed this as completed Feb 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ana-GT ana-GT

Labels
priority: medium should be resolved before the next release type: bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior
Projects
None yet
Milestone
DART 5.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@tobiaskunz @ana-GT @mxgrey @jslee02