Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing issue #47 and adding PlanarJoint support for URDFs #326

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2015

Conversation

mxgrey
Copy link
Member

@mxgrey mxgrey commented Feb 3, 2015

No description provided.

joint = new dynamics::PlanarJoint();
// TODO(MXG): Should we read in position limits? The URDF limits
// specification only offers one dimension of limits, but a PlanarJoint is
// two-dimensional. Should we assume that position limits apply to both
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, it's three-dimensional; x, y, and theta.

Let's not to accept the position limits for now. Can you create an issue for this?

@jslee02
Copy link
Member

jslee02 commented Feb 4, 2015

+1

@jslee02 jslee02 added this to the Release DART 5.0 milestone Feb 4, 2015
jslee02 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2015
Fixing issue #47 and adding PlanarJoint support for URDFs
@jslee02 jslee02 merged commit 8cf6ac6 into master Feb 4, 2015
@mxgrey mxgrey deleted the grey/urdf_fixes branch February 16, 2015 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants