-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Backport critical fixes from develop #1828
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…et (dashpay#1819) dashpay#1695 introduced a fix for a instant send related edge case. Somehow the parameters got mixed up and fUseInstantSend was passed as "iterations".
d7828ab check that transactionView->selectionModel()->selectedRows(0) exists (fsb4000)
schinzelh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
|
Updated PR description (added TODO list) to make it easier to follow the progress. |
| currentWatchImmatureBalance(-1), | ||
| txdelegate(new TxViewDelegate(platformStyle, this)) | ||
| txdelegate(new TxViewDelegate(platformStyle, this)), | ||
| timer(nullptr) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
timer should be initialised first in the list.
gcc 7.1 gives this warning:
In file included from ../../src/qt/overviewpage.cpp:6:0:
../../src/qt/overviewpage.h: In constructor ‘OverviewPage::OverviewPage(const PlatformStyle*, QWidget*)’:
../../src/qt/overviewpage.h:64:21: warning: ‘OverviewPage::txdelegate’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder]
TxViewDelegate *txdelegate;
^~~~~~~~~~
../../src/qt/overviewpage.h:50:13: warning: ‘QTimer* OverviewPage::timer’ [-Wreorder]
QTimer *timer;
^~~~~
../../src/qt/overviewpage.cpp:124:1: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder]
OverviewPage::OverviewPage(const PlatformStyle *platformStyle, QWidget *parent) :
^~~~~~~~~~~~
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, noticed this as well. However, a) this is not critical imo and b) should be fixed in develop, not here.
revert to pre-1248 logic for liquidity providers
[backport] Fixes compatibility with boost 1.66
|
Added #1836 |
|
Please see https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/1834/files#r160357936 for a possible locking problem. |
|
Added #1840 |
codablock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Things to include:
Note: this should be merged without squashing