Skip to content

Conversation

@UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented May 10, 2021

I think I got it wrong in #3987 - we bail out on CL vs IS conflicts earlier actually and the patched part of ResolveBlockConflicts was about IS vs a regular block conflicts only. develop works both with and without c3c59e4 which proves the patch did not fix anything, 5e12fb6 extends tests a bit and fails without c3c59e4 which proves the old patch introduced a bug 🙈

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link

@xdustinface xdustinface left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@xdustinface xdustinface merged commit 90d7e1f into dashpay:develop May 11, 2021
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request May 14, 2021
…icts (dashpay#4146)

* tests: Check that CLs override ISes which invalidated non-CLed blocks earlier

* partial revert 3987: Do not mark blocks which conflict with ISes as "conflicting"
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 deleted the part_revert_3924 branch July 1, 2021 22:05
gades pushed a commit to cosanta/cosanta-core that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
…icts (dashpay#4146)

* tests: Check that CLs override ISes which invalidated non-CLed blocks earlier

* partial revert 3987: Do not mark blocks which conflict with ISes as "conflicting"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants