Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complex type promotion diagram disappears in the draft standard #477

Closed
leofang opened this issue Sep 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #491
Closed

Complex type promotion diagram disappears in the draft standard #477

leofang opened this issue Sep 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #491
Labels
Maintenance Bug fix, typo fix, or general maintenance. topic: Complex Data Types Complex number data types. topic: Type Promotion Type promotion.

Comments

@leofang
Copy link
Contributor

leofang commented Sep 11, 2022

In the 2021.12 standard it is here: https://data-apis.org/array-api/2021.12/API_specification/data_types.html#float64, which says it "will be added to Type Promotion Rules". But it disappears in both Data Types and Type Promotion Rules sections of the draft standard. I think it was a simple overlook when creating the versioned standards.

@leofang leofang added topic: Complex Data Types Complex number data types. Maintenance Bug fix, typo fix, or general maintenance. labels Sep 11, 2022
rgommers added a commit to rgommers/array-api that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2022
- Add a table with promotion rules
- Update type promotion lattice diagram

Closes data-apisgh-477
Closes data-apisgh-478
@rgommers rgommers added the topic: Type Promotion Type promotion. label Oct 7, 2022
@kgryte kgryte closed this as completed in aefec14 Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Bug fix, typo fix, or general maintenance. topic: Complex Data Types Complex number data types. topic: Type Promotion Type promotion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants