Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http client builder for connection manager #337

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

vikrantpuppala
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Add the ability to provide non proxy hosts via databricks config as well

Tests

Local testing

@vikrantpuppala vikrantpuppala changed the title [Feature] add non proxy hosts to databricks config as well [Feature] Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http client builder Sep 10, 2024
@vikrantpuppala vikrantpuppala changed the title [Feature] Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http client builder [Feature] Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http client builder for connection manager Sep 13, 2024
@mgyucht mgyucht added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into databricks:main with commit b692350 Sep 13, 2024
10 checks passed
tanmay-db added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
### New Features and Improvements

 * Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http client builder for connection manager ([#337](#337)).

### Bug Fixes

 * Remove Path Parameters from JSON body ([#344](#344)).
 * Stop pagination on empty next page token ([#343](#343)).
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
### New Features and Improvements

* Remove proxy settings from databricks config and use commons http
client builder for connection manager
([#337](#337)).


### Bug Fixes

* Remove Path Parameters from JSON body
([#344](#344)).
* Stop pagination on empty next page token
([#343](#343)).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants