Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow-table-extended-to-handle-more-than-2048-chars #326

Conversation

josephberni
Copy link
Contributor

@josephberni josephberni commented Apr 28, 2023

Resolves #325

Description

This PR allows the adapter to handle strings of more than 2048 characters when running show tables extended in Databricks. This is currently preventing users from being able to run this command when using dbt if they have a large number of tables in any given schema.

The way this is done is that it will pass the * in instances where the string length of the pipe separated tables is more than 2048 chars.

I have successfully tested both unit tests and tox -e integration-databricks-sql-endpoint.

Checklist

  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md and added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.

@andrefurlan-db andrefurlan-db changed the base branch from main to staging-326 May 2, 2023 16:17
@andrefurlan-db
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the PR. I'll merge to staging-326 and run the integration tests.

@andrefurlan-db andrefurlan-db merged commit d865be1 into databricks:staging-326 May 2, 2023
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
<!-- Please review our pull request review process in CONTRIBUTING.md before your proceed. -->

Resolves [#326](#326)

<!---
  Include the number of the issue addressed by this PR above if applicable.
  
  Example:
    resolves #1234

  Please review our pull request review process in CONTRIBUTING.md before your proceed.
-->

### Description

This PR allows the adapter to handle strings of more than 2048 characters when running show tables extended in Databricks. This is currently preventing users from being able to run this command when using dbt if they have a large number of tables in any given schema. 

The way this is done is that it will pass the `*` in instances where the string length of the pipe separated tables is more than 2048 chars.

I have successfully tested both unit tests and `tox -e integration-databricks-sql-endpoint`.

### Checklist

- [x] I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
- [x] This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
- [x] I have updated the `CHANGELOG.md` and added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Berni <99652623+josephberni@users.noreply.github.com>
benc-db pushed a commit to benc-db/dbt-databricks that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
) (databricks#330)

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Berni <99652623+josephberni@users.noreply.github.com>
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
…g users (#404)

* Bump version number

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
…g users (#404)

* Bump version number

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
susodapop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants