Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow-table-extended-to-handle-more-than-2048-chars (#326) #330

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

andrefurlan-db
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolves #326

Description

This PR allows the adapter to handle strings of more than 2048 characters when running show tables extended in Databricks. This is currently preventing users from being able to run this command when using dbt if they have a large number of tables in any given schema.

The way this is done is that it will pass the * in instances where the string length of the pipe separated tables is more than 2048 chars.

I have successfully tested both unit tests and tox -e integration-databricks-sql-endpoint.

Checklist

  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md and added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.

@DanFitzgibbon
Copy link

Hi @andrefurlan-db! Sorry to tag you here but was just wondering: when can we expect this change to be merged, please?
TIA!

@josephberni
Copy link
Contributor

Any update on when we can expect to see this fix implemented? @rcypher-databricks @andrefurlan-db ?

<!-- Please review our pull request review process in CONTRIBUTING.md before your proceed. -->

Resolves [#326](#326)

<!---
  Include the number of the issue addressed by this PR above if applicable.
  
  Example:
    resolves #1234

  Please review our pull request review process in CONTRIBUTING.md before your proceed.
-->

### Description

This PR allows the adapter to handle strings of more than 2048 characters when running show tables extended in Databricks. This is currently preventing users from being able to run this command when using dbt if they have a large number of tables in any given schema. 

The way this is done is that it will pass the `*` in instances where the string length of the pipe separated tables is more than 2048 chars.

I have successfully tested both unit tests and `tox -e integration-databricks-sql-endpoint`.

### Checklist

- [x] I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
- [x] This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
- [x] I have updated the `CHANGELOG.md` and added information about my change to the "dbt-databricks next" section.
@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-pecou July 24, 2023 15:04 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@susodapop
Copy link
Contributor

This went stale because of inattention. But the change has been approved. I just rebased the branch off of main so we can rerun the integration tests. Will merge once these pass.

@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-pecou July 24, 2023 15:54 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-pecou July 24, 2023 16:30 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-peco July 24, 2023 16:30 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-pecou July 24, 2023 17:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@susodapop susodapop temporarily deployed to azure-prod-peco July 24, 2023 17:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@susodapop susodapop merged commit 84a7e97 into main Jul 24, 2023
9 checks passed
benc-db pushed a commit to benc-db/dbt-databricks that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
) (databricks#330)

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <jesse.whitehouse@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Berni <99652623+josephberni@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants