Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(lmp): call model deviation interface without atomic properties when they are not requested #4012

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jul 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced computation flexibility by introducing conditional logic for handling different sets of parameters based on specific flags.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved robustness by ensuring computations do not attempt to access uninitialized elements, preventing potential errors.
  • Refactor

    • Modified control flow to accommodate various computational scenarios, optimizing the function's performance.

…en they are not requested

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The modifications to the PairDeepMD::compute function enhance its flexibility by introducing conditional logic based on the flags eflag_atom and cvflag_atom. This allows the function to compute using different sets of parameters, thereby improving robustness and preventing potential errors related to uninitialized variables. The control flow changes ensure that certain computations are only performed when necessary, streamlining the process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp Modified PairDeepMD::compute to conditionally invoke deep_pot_model_devi.compute based on eflag_atom and cvflag_atom. Improved robustness by ensuring variables are assigned only when relevant flags are true.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant PairDeepMD
    participant DeepPotModel
    
    User->>PairDeepMD: Call compute()
    PairDeepMD->>PairDeepMD: Check eflag_atom, cvflag_atom
    alt Both false
        PairDeepMD->>DeepPotModel: compute(all_energy, all_force, all_virial)
    else Either true
        PairDeepMD->>DeepPotModel: compute(all_energy, all_force, all_virial, all_atom_energy, all_atom_virial)
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp (4)

665-665: Add a comment to explain the conditional check.

Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for determining if atomic properties are needed would improve code readability.

// Check if atomic properties are not needed
if (!(eflag_atom || cvflag_atom)) {

673-673: Add a comment to explain the else block.

Adding a comment here to explain that the else block handles the case when atomic properties are needed would improve code readability.

// Handle case when atomic properties are needed
else {

692-692: Add a comment to explain the conditional check for eflag_atom.

Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for updating atomic energy would improve code readability.

// Update atomic energy if eflag_atom is set
if (eflag_atom) {

701-701: Add a comment to explain the conditional check for cvflag_atom.

Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for updating atomic virial would improve code readability.

// Update atomic virial if cvflag_atom is set
if (cvflag_atom) {

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.83%. Comparing base (269ed3e) to head (75120b2).
Report is 103 commits behind head on devel.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp 50.00% 5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4012      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.83%   82.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         522      522              
  Lines       50936    50941       +5     
  Branches     3015     3016       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        42195    42196       +1     
- Misses       7804     7807       +3     
- Partials      937      938       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 02:58
Copy link
Member Author

@njzjz njzjz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe merged after #4013. The tests in #4013 are useful for this PR.

@njzjz njzjz requested review from iProzd and wanghan-iapcm July 24, 2024 04:23
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit a010ae9 Jul 24, 2024
60 checks passed
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
…en they are not requested (deepmodeling#4012)

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced computation flexibility by introducing conditional logic for
handling different sets of parameters based on specific flags.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved robustness by ensuring computations do not attempt to access
uninitialized elements, preventing potential errors.

- **Refactor**
- Modified control flow to accommodate various computational scenarios,
optimizing the function's performance.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants