-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(lmp): call model deviation interface without atomic properties when they are not requested #4012
fix(lmp): call model deviation interface without atomic properties when they are not requested #4012
Conversation
…en they are not requested Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PairDeepMD
participant DeepPotModel
User->>PairDeepMD: Call compute()
PairDeepMD->>PairDeepMD: Check eflag_atom, cvflag_atom
alt Both false
PairDeepMD->>DeepPotModel: compute(all_energy, all_force, all_virial)
else Either true
PairDeepMD->>DeepPotModel: compute(all_energy, all_force, all_virial, all_atom_energy, all_atom_virial)
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp (4)
665-665
: Add a comment to explain the conditional check.Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for determining if atomic properties are needed would improve code readability.
// Check if atomic properties are not needed if (!(eflag_atom || cvflag_atom)) {
673-673
: Add a comment to explain the else block.Adding a comment here to explain that the else block handles the case when atomic properties are needed would improve code readability.
// Handle case when atomic properties are needed else {
692-692
: Add a comment to explain the conditional check foreflag_atom
.Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for updating atomic energy would improve code readability.
// Update atomic energy if eflag_atom is set if (eflag_atom) {
701-701
: Add a comment to explain the conditional check forcvflag_atom
.Adding a comment here to explain that the conditional check is for updating atomic virial would improve code readability.
// Update atomic virial if cvflag_atom is set if (cvflag_atom) {
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #4012 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.83% 82.83% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 522 522
Lines 50936 50941 +5
Branches 3015 3016 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 42195 42196 +1
- Misses 7804 7807 +3
- Partials 937 938 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
…en they are not requested (deepmodeling#4012) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced computation flexibility by introducing conditional logic for handling different sets of parameters based on specific flags. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved robustness by ensuring computations do not attempt to access uninitialized elements, preventing potential errors. - **Refactor** - Modified control flow to accommodate various computational scenarios, optimizing the function's performance. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor