Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add unittest for virial and pe/atom #4013

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

Yi-FanLi
Copy link
Collaborator

@Yi-FanLi Yi-FanLi commented Jul 24, 2024

Addresses #3943

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced testing functionality for pressure calculations alongside virial computations in the simulation framework.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved reliability and accuracy of test assertions for pressure values, ensuring better validation of simulation results.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the test_pair_deepmd_virial function in test_lammps.py by incorporating additional computations and assertions for pressure alongside existing virial calculations. The updated code calculates pressure using LAMMPS' compute method and introduces assertions to validate these values against expected results. This improvement significantly increases the test's robustness and coverage, ensuring accurate assessment of both pressure and virial computations within the deepmd pair style in LAMMPS.

Changes

Files Change Summary
source/lmp/tests/test_lammps.py Enhanced the test_pair_deepmd_virial function to include pressure calculations and assertions, thereby improving test robustness and coverage.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Script
    participant LAMMPS as LAMMPS Simulation
    participant NumPy as NumPy Library

    Test->>LAMMPS: Compute virial
    Test->>LAMMPS: Compute pressure
    LAMMPS-->>Test: Return virial values
    LAMMPS-->>Test: Return pressure values
    Test->>NumPy: Validate virial values
    Test->>NumPy: Validate pressure values
    NumPy-->>Test: Return validation results
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
source/lmp/tests/test_lammps.py (1)

326-328: Define pressure variables using a loop.

The loop correctly defines pressure variables based on the computed values. However, consider adding comments for better readability.

+    # Define pressure variables from computed values
    for ii in range(9):
        jj = [0, 4, 8, 3, 6, 7, 1, 2, 5][ii]
        lammps.variable(f"pressure{jj} c_pressure[{ii+1}]")

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.93%. Comparing base (806859b) to head (a0df97e).
Report is 100 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4013      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.92%   82.93%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         522      522              
  Lines       51005    51005              
  Branches     3022     3022              
==========================================
+ Hits        42294    42300       +6     
+ Misses       7767     7763       -4     
+ Partials      944      942       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 5dd0062 Jul 24, 2024
60 checks passed
@Yi-FanLi Yi-FanLi deleted the virial_test branch July 26, 2024 02:55
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
Addresses deepmodeling#3943 

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit



- **New Features**
- Enhanced testing functionality for pressure calculations alongside
virial computations in the simulation framework.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability and accuracy of test assertions for pressure
values, ensuring better validation of simulation results.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Add unit test for LAMMPS atomic energy and virial output
3 participants