Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

UT Coverage #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

UT Coverage #86

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

satyakonduri
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Increasing Unit test code coverage

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1707

Results when ran unit tests locally:
image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

@satyakonduri satyakonduri mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
Closed
10 tasks
@satyakonduri satyakonduri merged commit 47afb5b into main Mar 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@satyakonduri satyakonduri deleted the UT_Coverage_new branch March 3, 2025 05:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@chimanjain chimanjain chimanjain approved these changes

@khareRajshree khareRajshree khareRajshree approved these changes

@suryagupta4 suryagupta4 suryagupta4 approved these changes

@kumarp20 kumarp20 Awaiting requested review from kumarp20 kumarp20 is a code owner

@bpjain2004 bpjain2004 Awaiting requested review from bpjain2004 bpjain2004 is a code owner

@francis-nijay francis-nijay Awaiting requested review from francis-nijay francis-nijay is a code owner

@harishp8889 harishp8889 Awaiting requested review from harishp8889 harishp8889 is a code owner

@prablr79 prablr79 Awaiting requested review from prablr79 prablr79 is a code owner

@hoppea2 hoppea2 Awaiting requested review from hoppea2 hoppea2 is a code owner

@tdawe tdawe Awaiting requested review from tdawe tdawe is a code owner

@coulof coulof Awaiting requested review from coulof coulof is a code owner

@shaynafinocchiaro shaynafinocchiaro Awaiting requested review from shaynafinocchiaro shaynafinocchiaro is a code owner

@xuluna xuluna Awaiting requested review from xuluna xuluna is a code owner

@alikdell alikdell Awaiting requested review from alikdell alikdell is a code owner

@atye atye Awaiting requested review from atye atye is a code owner

@alankar-verma alankar-verma Awaiting requested review from alankar-verma alankar-verma is a code owner

@chaganti-rajitha chaganti-rajitha Awaiting requested review from chaganti-rajitha chaganti-rajitha is a code owner

@niranjan-n1 niranjan-n1 Awaiting requested review from niranjan-n1 niranjan-n1 is a code owner

@samihan-dell samihan-dell Awaiting requested review from samihan-dell samihan-dell is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@satyakonduri @chimanjain @khareRajshree @suryagupta4