-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improved modeling of galaxies with broad+narrow line-emission #142
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5730114249Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
…ts but more like 5%-10% for whole healpixels (N>1000)
This PR implements some key improvements in the broad-line fitting based on conversations with @stephjuneau, @Ragadeepika-Pucha, @paulmartini, and others. The key developments / insights are:
The last two criteria are needed to prevent broad lines from over-fitting lines in (especially) low-mass dwarf galaxies or to capture unmodeled residuals in the stellar continuum. Note that there is no longer any formal S/N cut on the broad-line amplitude. (Previously the two reddest broad Balmer lines, e.g., H-alpha and H-beta for lower-redshift objects, were required to be detected with >3-sigma significance, which threw out many bona fide Seyfert 1.5s highlighted in #118.) Here's a quick comparison of the statistics for a single healpix, |
[WIP]
Algorithmic improvements in order to address #118. Details to follow.