Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add 386, arm, and arm64 to ubuntu buildscripts #368

Closed

Conversation

theofficialgman
Copy link
Contributor

@theofficialgman theofficialgman commented May 7, 2022

current use of 64 and 32 in github actions is unaffected and will function as before

added arm, and arm64 as acceptable TARGET_ARCH options

this allows for making local builds of dugite-native on arm/arm64 hardware using the same buildscripts used in the github actions.
future changes may allow for building through github actions as well using cross compilation (or self hosted runner, see below)

@theofficialgman
Copy link
Contributor Author

theofficialgman commented Aug 2, 2022

@shiftkey LGTM

you can see I also have a separate branch on my fork where I am personally using the always free tier of the Oracle Cloud services with Ampere ARM A1 processors to build with a github self hosted runner on a bionic arm64 image https://www.oracle.com/cloud/free/
theofficialgman@96d5e07
https://github.com/theofficialgman/dugite-native/actions/runs/2779374451

I don't see why the desktop team can not do the same.

@theofficialgman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tidy-dev @shiftkey @sergiou87 @niik I am once again requesting that this be merged

it is a non-breaking change to your CI and makes building on x86, arm, and arm64 linux work out of the box without having to constantly rebase this patch on master

added arm, and arm64 as acceptable TARGET_ARCH options

correct update-git-lfs.ts to update linux x86, arm64, and arm

transition to use significantly better naming scheme in preparation for extension to multiple more architectures
@theofficialgman
Copy link
Contributor Author

theofficialgman commented Feb 18, 2023

closing in favor of a new cross compiling PR that you WILL merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant